badge icon

This article was automatically translated from the original Turkish version.

Article

Divided Class Experiment

Quote

The Divided Classroom Experiment (Blue-Eyes/Brown-Eyes Exercise), a social psychologist Jane Elliott initiated in 1968 as an experimental educational method. The exercise aims to raise awareness of racial prejudice, discrimination, and stereotyping. Participants are divided into advantaged or disadvantaged groups based on eye color; this process allows them to directly experience the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral consequences of prejudice. The experiment was designed to demonstrate that prejudice is not merely a cognitive process but also shapes social behavior and emotional responses.  


Jane Elliott’s Experiment Reveals How Racism Is Learned (Anadolu Ajansı)

Historical Context and Development

The experiment was conducted in 1968 in the United States of America, shortly after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., by Elliott in an elementary school in Iowa. Elliott developed a simple yet effective method to help young students experience their capacity to comprehend prejudice. Over time, the exercise was applied to university students and adult groups, becoming a significant educational tool in the field of social psychology.  

Application Method and Process

The experiment begins by dividing participants into two groups based on eye color: blue-eyed and brown-eyed. One group (for example, the blue-eyed participants) is temporarily placed in a disadvantaged position: they are criticized, their rights are restricted, and they are told that poor performance is expected. The other group is placed in an advantaged position: they receive praise, are granted privileges, and are rewarded for positive behavior. During the experiment, participants observe how status differences within the classroom contribute to the creation of discrimination and prejudice. The instructor provides feedback throughout the exercise to help individuals recognize their own attitudes and behaviors.

Emotional and Cognitive Effects

Research shows that participants become aware of their own prejudices by experiencing the discrimination faced by others. Members of the disadvantaged group experience anxiety, anger, and stress, while the advantaged group experiences the responsibilities associated with power and privilege. These emotional responses can contribute to reducing prejudice but may also generate resistance or negative stress in some individuals. Studies on white participants have shown that the exercise significantly improved attitudes toward Asian Americans and Latino/Latina individuals, but produced only limited changes in attitudes toward African Americans.


Visual Representation of the Divided Classroom Experiment (Generated by Artificial Intelligence)

Theoretical Foundation and Social Psychological Significance

The Divided Classroom Experiment provides a theoretical framework for developing empathy and awareness regarding prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. The exercise goes beyond helping individuals understand prejudice as a purely cognitive phenomenon by enabling them to experience it at the behavioral and emotional levels, thereby supporting processes of social learning and attitude change. In the fields of social psychology and education, it is an important method for observing and reducing the effects of prejudice.

Ethical Debates and Criticisms

The exposure of participants to negative emotional experiences during the exercise has raised ethical concerns. Critics emphasize that such experiences may have long-term psychological effects, especially in children, and that these intense emotional experiences must be carefully managed within educational contexts. In contrast, proponents argue that the empathy and awareness generated by the exercise carry social value that outweighs its short-term negative effects.  

Variations in Application

Over time, the exercise has been applied to various age groups, university students, and adult participants. In some versions, eye color has been replaced by other social identity factors such as gender, socioeconomic class, or ethnic background. Modern applications are designed within ethical standards, providing participants with advance information and opportunities for post-exercise discussion.

Bibliographies

Anadolu Ajansı. "Ayrımcılığı göz rengiyle öğretmek: Jane Elliott’un devrim yaratan deneyi." Accessed October 5, 2025.https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/ayrimcilikhatti/vg/video-galeri/ayrimciligi-goz-rengiyle-ogretmek-jane-elliott-un-devrim-yaratan-deneyi/93160

Byrnes, Deborah A., and Gary Kiger. “Ethical and Pedagogical Issues in the Use of Simulation Activities in the Classroom: Evaluating the 'Blue Eyes-Brown Eyes' Prejudice Simulation.” ERIC ED300491, 1988. Accessed October 5, 2025.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED300491

PBS Frontline. "Introduction." Accessed October 5, 2025.https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/introduction-2/

Stewart, Tracie L., Jacqueline R. Laduke, Charlotte Bracht, Brooke A. M. Sweet, and Kristine E. Gamarel. “Do the 'Eyes' Have It? A Program Evaluation of Jane Elliott's 'Blue-Eyes/Brown-Eyes' Diversity Training Exercise.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1898–1921 (2003): 1–17. Accessed October 5, 2025.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02086.x

Author Information

Avatar
AuthorMiray GÜRJuly 14, 2026 at 3:37 PM

Discussions

No Discussion Added Yet

Start discussion for "Divided Class Experiment" article

View Discussions

Contents

  • Historical Context and Development

  • Application Method and Process

  • Emotional and Cognitive Effects

  • Theoretical Foundation and Social Psychological Significance

  • Ethical Debates and Criticisms

  • Variations in Application