This article was automatically translated from the original Turkish version.
InfiniBand
Basic Feature(s) | QoS (Quality of Service) and error correction mechanisms RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) support high bandwidth (HDR: 200 Gbps NDR: 400 Gbps XDR: 800 Gbps) Low latency (sub-microsecond) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name(s) | InfiniBand | ||||||||
Disadvantages | High setup cost, specialized hardware requirement | ||||||||
Advantage(s) | Low CPU usage high data transfer rate | ||||||||
InfiniBand is a system interconnect architecture that provides high bandwidth, low latency, and high reliability. It was initially developed in the early 2000s as a merger of the Future I/O and Next Generation I/O initiatives, designed to overcome the limitations of traditional bus technologies such as PCI, PCI-X, and AGP. It is widely used in data centers, high-performance computing (HPC), supercomputers, and artificial intelligence infrastructure to enable high-speed data transfer between servers, storage systems, and network infrastructure.
InfiniBand architecture has a layered structure similar to OSI model. This structure consists of five fundamental layers:
InfiniBand can operate not only in point-to-point connections but also in topologies such as fat-tree, mesh, and torus, which are supported by switches. Configuration is managed through the Subnet Manager (SM).
InfiniBand stands out due to its high-speed data transfer and low latency. Different speeds are achieved through lane configurations of 1X, 4X, 8X, and 12X. Starting with SDR (Single Data Rate – 2.5 Gbps), InfiniBand technology now supports advanced standards such as HDR (High Data Rate – 200 Gbps), NDR (Next Data Rate – 400 Gbps), and the planned XDR (eXtreme Data Rate – 800 Gbps).
Due to these features, InfiniBand is particularly preferred in HPC and data-intensive applications.
InfiniBand is preferred in systems requiring low latency and high throughput, while Ethernet is used for broader, more cost-effective solutions.
InfiniBand technology is widely used in the following areas:
Dalessandro, Brian, Pavan Balaji, Darius Buntinas, David Goodell, William Gropp, and Rajeev Thakur. *Evaluation of the Current InfiniBand Software Stack*. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2005. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2172/877537.
FS Community. “InfiniBand vs Ethernet: What Are They?” FS Blog. Accessed May 7, 2025. https://www.fs.com/blog/infiniband-vs-ethernet-what-are-they-2740.html.
Gabert, Karl. *An Introduction to InfiniBand for End Users*. InfiniBand Trade Association, 2003. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/ib-docs/Intro_to_IB_for_End_Users.pdf.
Shanley, Tom. *InfiniBand Network Architecture*. Addison-Wesley, 2003. Accessed May 9, 2025. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=4s0BNIxPsdIC&pg=PR8.
InfiniBand
Basic Feature(s) | QoS (Quality of Service) and error correction mechanisms RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) support high bandwidth (HDR: 200 Gbps NDR: 400 Gbps XDR: 800 Gbps) Low latency (sub-microsecond) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name(s) | InfiniBand | ||||||||
Disadvantages | High setup cost, specialized hardware requirement | ||||||||
Advantage(s) | Low CPU usage high data transfer rate | ||||||||
Architecture
Performance and Technical Specifications
InfiniBand vs Ethernet
Applications