---
title: Baghdad Battery
slug: baghdad-battery
url: /detay/baghdad-battery
type: article
language: English
entity:
  primary: Baghdad Battery
  type: article
  disambiguation: Uncover the mystery!  The Baghdad Battery: 2,000-year-old artifact—ancient battery or storage?
  categories:
    - name: Archeology
      slug: arkeoloji
      url: /kategori/arkeoloji
    - name: History Of Science
      slug: bilim-tarihi
      url: /kategori/bilim-tarihi
  tags:
    - BaghdadBattery
author: Nazlı Kemerkaya
created_at: 2024-12-06T11:05:08.538054+03:00
updated_at: 2025-09-25T12:06:08.106427+03:00
image: https://cdn.t3pedia.org/media/uploads/2025/09/24/RO3m0g7h0n4wsnkUdmQd68tc6V2i3dai.png
---

# Baghdad Battery

<!-- CONTEXT: KURE Information Cards for "Baghdad Battery" -->

## KURE Information Cards

![ChatGPT Image 24 Eyl 2025 00_32_32.png](https://cdn.t3pedia.org/media/uploads/2025/09/24/7z0Z0GAvZKfGJgn1nDeYM2gnIqBAQiJu.png)
*Baghdad Battery (Created by AI.)*

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Year of Discovery(ies)(Text) | 1936 |
| Date(s)(Text) | Parthian Period (248 BCE – 226 CE) |
| Materials and Construction | Bitumen stopper,Iron rod,Copper cylinder,Unglazed ceramic vessel |
| Identified by | Wilhelm König |
| Findspot | Near Baghdad / Iraq |

<!-- CONTEXT: Article Content for "Baghdad Battery" -->

## Article Content

The [Baghdad Battery](/en/detay/pilin-icadi/llms.txt) is a grave find discovered near Baghdad in 1938 and dated to the Parthian period. It consists of an unglazed ceramic vessel approximately 14 cm in height and 8 cm in diameter. A [copper](/en/detay/copper-3f9fd/llms.txt) cylinder with a soldered bottom was placed into the vessel’s opening, and an iron rod was suspended inside the cylinder. The copper and iron pieces were secured with a pitch-like sealant. In some examples, papyrus remains were found inside the copper cylinder, while in others only the copper cylinder or only the iron rod was present. The arrangement appears to have been designed in such a way as to allow different metals to come into contact within a liquid.

### **Debates on Function**

Various interpretations have been proposed regarding the purpose of the [Baghdad Battery](/en/detay/bagdat-pili-2/llms.txt). Wilhelm König’s initial suggestion in 1938 was that these devices were used as simple [electric cells](/en/detay/electric-charge-dda63/llms.txt). Building on this view, some researchers have argued that the vessels were designed for electroplating.

Kanani’s experiments demonstrated that such devices could produce a [voltage](/en/detay/voltage/llms.txt) of about 0.5 volts and, when using a gold cyanide solution, were capable of creating a thin plating. By contrast, researchers such as Oddy and Peck have noted that plating in the ancient world was carried out using foil, leaf, or mercury amalgam techniques, and that the Baghdad Battery provides no evidence for electroplating.

An alternative interpretation is that the devices served a medical purpose. Paul T. Keyser recalled that in ancient sources, electric fish were used as analgesics for the treatment of headaches and gout, and he suggested that the Baghdad Battery may have been developed to produce a similar electrical effect. This interpretation is seen as consistent with the device’s low voltage output.

Another view is that the devices held ritual or symbolic significance. Kurzmann and Peck argued that, due to the magical associations of copper and iron, these objects may have functioned as protective or symbolic items in a funerary context. The discovery of papyrus remains inside some vessels suggests that they might have been used to contain written messages or amulets.

Overall, since the available archaeological and chemical evidence does not confirm a definitive function, it remains uncertain whether the Baghdad Battery was used for electro-technical, medical, or ritual purposes.

### **Current Status**

The objects are held in the collection of the Iraq Museum in Baghdad. However, due to political and security conditions, researchers are not permitted direct access to them. As a result, the Baghdad Battery continues to be regarded in archaeology and the history of science as a controversial and inconclusive find.

<!-- CONTEXT: Academic Sources and References for "Baghdad Battery" -->

## Academic Sources and References

1. Handorf, D.E. Von. “The Baghdad Battery—Myth or Reality?”. Plating & Surface Finishing, (2022): 84–87. Accessed September 23, 2025. https://www.nmfrc.org/pdf/psf2002/050284.pdf Keyser, Paul T. “The Purpose of the Parthian Galvanic Cells: A First-Century A. D. Electric Battery Used for Analgesia”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 52, no. 2 (1993): 81–98. Accessed September 23, 2025. http://www.jstor.org/stable/545563